linux-kernel - [ 35/73] drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130509222530.036522208@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu,  9 May 2013 15:25:25 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@...el.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: [ 35/73] drm/i915: Workaround incoherence between fences and LLC across multiple CPUs

3.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>

commit 25ff1195f8a0b3724541ae7bbe331b4296de9c06 upstream.

In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and the update
to the fence register we need to take extreme measures on SNB+, and
manually flush writes to memory prior to writing the fence register in
conjunction with the memory barriers placed around the register write.

Fixes i-g-t/gem_fence_thrash

v2: Bring a bigger gun
v3: Switch the bigger gun for heavier bullets (Arjan van de Ven)
v4: Remove changes for working generations.
v5: Reduce to a per-cpu wbinvd() call prior to updating the fences.
v6: Rewrite comments to ellide forgotten history.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62191
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@...el.com>
Tested-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@...el.com> (v2)
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2678,17 +2678,35 @@ static inline int fence_number(struct dr
 	return fence - dev_priv->fence_regs;
 }
 
+static void i915_gem_write_fence__ipi(void *data)
+{
+	wbinvd();
+}
+
 static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 					 struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence,
 					 bool enable)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
-	int reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
+	struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	int fence_reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
 
-	i915_gem_write_fence(obj->base.dev, reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
+	/* In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and
+	 * the update to the fence register we need to take extreme
+	 * measures on SNB+. In theory, the write to the fence register
+	 * flushes all memory transactions before, and coupled with the
+	 * mb() placed around the register write we serialise all memory
+	 * operations with respect to the changes in the tiler. Yet, on
+	 * SNB+ we need to take a step further and emit an explicit wbinvd()
+	 * on each processor in order to manually flush all memory
+	 * transactions before updating the fence register.
+	 */
+	if (HAS_LLC(obj->base.dev))
+		on_each_cpu(i915_gem_write_fence__ipi, NULL, 1);
+	i915_gem_write_fence(dev, fence_reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
 
 	if (enable) {
-		obj->fence_reg = reg;
+		obj->fence_reg = fence_reg;
 		fence->obj = obj;
 		list_move_tail(&fence->lru_list, &dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
 	} else {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/