[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130510000552.GX3658@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 19:05:53 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v9 04/11] Move shutdown/reboot related functions to
kernel/reboot.c
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 01:51:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:23:18 -0500 Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
>
> > This patch is preparatory. It moves reboot related syscall, etc
> > functions from kernel/sys.c to kernel/reboot.c.
>
> This doesn't apply.
Weird, I just grabbed a recent Linus kernel tree and all 11 applied.
I then did an update to linus' tree to commit 70eba4226 and now I get
rejects on arm. I will resubmit a -v10 fixed up shortly.
Robin
>
> > -static void migrate_to_reboot_cpu(void)
> > -{
> > - /* The boot cpu is always logical cpu 0 */
> > - int cpu = 0;
> > -
> > - cpu_hotplug_disable();
> > -
> > - /* Make certain the cpu I'm about to reboot on is online */
> > - if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> > - cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>
> Here it's deleting code which was already modified by "[PATCH -v9
> 02/11] Migrate shutdown/reboot to boot cpu.". So patch [4/11]
> generates rejects when applied on top of [patch 2/11].
>
> There are several similar glitches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists