[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130510095014.GY3658@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 04:50:14 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v9 04/11] Move shutdown/reboot related functions to
kernel/reboot.c
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:05:53PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 01:51:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:23:18 -0500 Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch is preparatory. It moves reboot related syscall, etc
> > > functions from kernel/sys.c to kernel/reboot.c.
> >
> > This doesn't apply.
>
> Weird, I just grabbed a recent Linus kernel tree and all 11 applied.
> I then did an update to linus' tree to commit 70eba4226 and now I get
> rejects on arm. I will resubmit a -v10 fixed up shortly.
I wonder what you are seeing. I get all 11 to apply fairly cleanly with
only arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h getting conflicts on a commits after 009e63f
which are related to context. Otherwise, they applied cleanly. I assume
you removed the earlier version before trying to apply.
I can resubmit (and will add Ingo's Acked-by), but am not sure it is
going to help the situation. How would you like me to proceed?
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists