[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU177-W3584FC3A1BE197A6E3EA63C3A50@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 18:00:36 -0700
From: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@...mail.com>
To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@...l.net>,
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
CC: David Goodenough <david.goodenough@...onnect.com>,
"debian-arm@...ts.debian.org" <debian-arm@...ts.debian.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux on small ARM machines
<arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk>
Subject: RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running
Debian on a Cubieboard]
----------------------------------------
> From: yuhongbao_386@...mail.com
> To: lkcl@...l.net; hancockrwd@...il.com
> CC: david.goodenough@...onnect.com; debian-arm@...ts.debian.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk
> Subject: RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard]
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 17:56:33 -0700
>
> > the economics of market forces don't work that way.
> > profit-maximising companies are pathologically and *LEGALLY* bound to
> > enact the articles of incorporation. so you'd need to show them that
> > it would hurt their profits to continue the way that they are going.
> I think legally bound is a myth, but that is off-topic for lkml of course.
And obviously it doesn't matter if it is actually required by law if they practically behave that way.
Yuhong Bao --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists