[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518CCEC6.5050507@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:41:10 +0100
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: add support for clock reparent on set_rate
On 09/05/13 21:01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I believe we'll need to update the check in __clk_init() to allow you to
> have either a .round_rate or a .determine_rate op if you have a
> .recalc_rate op. Right now it fails to register the clock and then
> oopses later on while setting up clock debugfs.
>
> Here's a (probably whitespace damaged) patch for the first one.
Thanks, I'll incorporate that.
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists