[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUWZmcOv6WmpdUCqb-xwH9ZLrrXffv96j6hguV08OGtkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 18:21:33 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 0/8] Clean up write-combining MTRR addition
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> A fair number of drivers (mostly graphics) add write-combining MTRRs.
>> Most ignore errors and most add the MTRR even on PAT systems which don't
>> need to use MTRRs.
>
> This comment is wrong, as i said we need MTRR on PAT system for VRAM.
I didn't follow it last time.
- If userspace is setting an MTRR directly, then it will work exactly
as before -- this patch has no effect on the userspace MTRR APIs.
- If userspace uses the drm map interface with DRM_FRAME_BUFFER or
DRM_WRITE_COMBINING, there won't be an MTRR but the range will still
be WC.
- If userspace uses GEM or TTM, then everything should still use WC
(TTM has explicit handling for this, which I presume is correct, and
i915, the major GEM user, already doesn't set an MTRR).
- If userspace does not map the range, then either the kernel driver
is buggy or it doesn't matter because there's no map.
Is there a case I've missed?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists