[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <027FCDD209E4CC4181A7B9D5DBB88057249BFD2C@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 01:55:45 +0000
From: "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
To: "lrg@...mlogic.co.uk" <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: ASOC bug? maybe no need to set bias_level to PREPARE.
Hi, Girdwood
When I try to fix wm1811 standby issue for our customer, I find a strange behavior in ASOC core.
here is my test code:
snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(&dapm,"MICBIAS2");
snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(&dapm,"CLK_SYS");
snd_soc_dapm_sync(&dapm);
and add debug info in dapm_pre_sequence_async()
and we will find these debug info printed:
d->bias_level = 1
d->target_bias_level = 0
in snd_soc_dapm_set_bias_level
from the debug log, when STANDBY -> OFF transition, it set bias_level to PREPARE.
that's wrong logic.
And more there is comment in source code:
/* Prepare for a STADDBY->ON or ON->STANDBY transition */
But, the code isn't the same as the comment.
----
>From 58d8994bdc543909e9904b8df0787afc36684283 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ning.a.zhang <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 09:44:06 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] Asoc dapm behavior fix
in soc_dapm.c, there is a illogic behavior, when bias_level
from STANDBY -> OFF transition.
source does not follow its comment.
this patch is based on the comment
Signed-off-by: ning.a.zhang <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
---
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index d6d9ba2..834ab4c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -1486,8 +1486,9 @@ static void dapm_pre_sequence_async(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
"ASoC: Failed to turn on bias: %d\n", ret);
}
- /* Prepare for a STADDBY->ON or ON->STANDBY transition */
- if (d->bias_level != d->target_bias_level) {
+ /* If we're on and we're not supposed to be go into PREPARE */
+ if (d->bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_ON &&
+ d->target_bias_level != SND_SOC_BIAS_ON) {
ret = snd_soc_dapm_set_bias_level(d, SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE);
if (ret != 0)
dev_err(d->dev,
@@ -1525,6 +1526,15 @@ static void dapm_post_sequence_async(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
pm_runtime_put(d->dev);
}
+ if (d->bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY &&
+ (d->target_bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE ||
+ d->target_bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_ON)) {
+ ret = snd_soc_dapm_set_bias_level(d, SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE);
+ if (ret != 0)
+ dev_err(d->dev, "ASoC: Failed to apply prepare bias: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ }
+
/* If we just powered up then move to active bias */
if (d->bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE &&
d->target_bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_ON) {
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists