[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1368193181.716258675@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:39:41 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"nikolay@...hat.com" <nikolay@...hat.com>
Subject: [090/118] bonding: IFF_BONDING is not stripped on enslave failure
3.2.45-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "nikolay@...hat.com" <nikolay@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit b6a5a7b9a528a8b4c8bec940b607c5dd9102b8cc ]
While enslaving a new device and after IFF_BONDING flag is set, in case
of failure it is not stripped from the device's priv_flags while
cleaning up, which could lead to other problems.
Cleaning at err_close because the flag is set after dev_open().
v2: no change
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1866,6 +1866,7 @@ err_detach:
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
err_close:
+ slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_BONDING;
dev_close(slave_dev);
err_unset_master:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists