[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1368193181.646229936@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:39:41 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Ralf Baechle" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"Mathias Krause" <minipli@...glemail.com>
Subject: [107/118] rose: fix info leak via msg_name in rose_recvmsg()
3.2.45-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
[ Upstream commit 4a184233f21645cf0b719366210ed445d1024d72 ]
The code in rose_recvmsg() does not initialize all of the members of
struct sockaddr_rose/full_sockaddr_rose when filling the sockaddr info.
Nor does it initialize the padding bytes of the structure inserted by
the compiler for alignment. This will lead to leaking uninitialized
kernel stack bytes in net/socket.c.
Fix the issue by initializing the memory used for sockaddr info with
memset(0).
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/rose/af_rose.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -1258,6 +1258,7 @@ static int rose_recvmsg(struct kiocb *io
skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, 0, msg->msg_iov, copied);
if (srose != NULL) {
+ memset(srose, 0, msg->msg_namelen);
srose->srose_family = AF_ROSE;
srose->srose_addr = rose->dest_addr;
srose->srose_call = rose->dest_call;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists