linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/73] 3.9.2-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130510152800.GA11798@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 May 2013 08:28:00 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/73] 3.9.2-stable review

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:23:34PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 15:24 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.2 release.
> > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat May 11 22:23:28 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.2-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.77, 3.4.44, 3.8.12, and 3.9.1 
> 
> Compiled and booted on the following systems:
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5:
>     (3.4.45-rc1, 3.8.13-rc1, and 3.9.2-rc1)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics:
>     (3.0.78-rc1, 3.4.45-rc1, 3.8.13-rc1, and 3.9.2-rc1)
> 
> dmesgs for all releases look good. No regressions compared to the previous
> dmesgs for each of these releases.

Wonderful, thanks for testing all of these and letting us know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/