| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAA_GA1cA0RrmcWhBcD9iWs2LjHVns-B+6SEimSzx4yiZDKxiVg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 10:58:06 +0800 From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Cc: "Steven Miao (Steven Miao)" <realmz6@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org" <uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] [GIT PULL] Blackfin updates for 3.10 On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:53:42 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: >> >> Hmm. I'm used to pull blackfin updates from Bob Liu. I see that he has >> signed your gpg key, so this all looks fine, but quite frankly, Id' >> much rather be told ahead of time that "oh, expect pulls from another >> person". >> >> I do *not* want to end up in some kind of fight over who maintains >> what. Bob? Am I supposed to expect blackfin pulls to come from Steven >> now? Or is this a one-off? Or what? > > And should this tree be included in linux-next for future work (as well, > or instead of, the current blackfin tree)? > Yes, please! And now you can drop my blackfin git tree from linux-next. -- Regards, --Bob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists