[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130510173511.GA28490@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:35:11 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] init/Kconfig: Add option to set modprobe command
On 05/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 05/10, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >
> > but I think it's a good tradeoff and covers other use cases as you
> > pointed out as well.
>
> OK, good.
Yes, perhaps this makes sense anyway but...
> > Ok. I'll give it a try.
>
> Please wait a bit, I'll send v2. See below.
Cough, wait ;)
Why do we need theese changes ????
> > > -char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe";
> > > +char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe -q --";
>
> No. This is incompatible change, we shouldn't do this.
Exactly. This can break a distro which writes to sys/kernel/modprobe.
And if we do not do this, you can simply make a single trivial patch
which does
- char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe";
+ char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = CONFIG_DEFAULT_MODULE_LOAD_BIN;
that it all. (or perhaps a kernel parameter makes more sense).
Yes, this doesn't allow to pass the additional arguments, but is it
that important?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists