linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (e

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 May 2013 11:27:38 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rafal Bilski <rafalbilski@...eria.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (e_powersaver)

On 05/09/13 20:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
> 
> Changes since 20130509:
> 

on i386:
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
CONFIG_X86_E_POWERSAVER=y


drivers/built-in.o: In function `eps_cpu_init.part.8':
e_powersaver.c:(.text.unlikely+0x2243): undefined reference to `acpi_processor_register_performance'
e_powersaver.c:(.text.unlikely+0x22a2): undefined reference to `acpi_processor_unregister_performance'
e_powersaver.c:(.text.unlikely+0x246b): undefined reference to `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit'


X86_E_POWERSAVER should also depend on ACPI_PROCESSOR.



-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/