[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F2DA4C9B9@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:09:32 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Ming Lei <Ming.Lei@...erbed.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "mchehab@...hat.com" <mchehab@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: RE: x86_mce: mce_start uses number of phsical cores instead of
logical cores
> With hyperthread turns on, the num_online_cpus reports the number of all logical cores.
> What I found in testing is only half the cores receives the mce broadcast, so I assume only the physical cores get broadcast.
See Intel Software Developer Manual Volume 3B Section 15.10.4.1, 3rd bullet:
o For processors on which CPUID reports DisplayFamily_DisplayModel as 06H_0EH and onward, an MCA signal is
broadcast to all logical processors in the system
Your E-5645 processors are a lot newer than this cut-off version - so they should broadcast
to all your threads.
You are seeing something very strange. It would be interesting to know *which* 12 cpus
show up for your machine check. Perhaps you are seeing all the hyperthreads from one
socket and none from the other?
I still suspect that something is strange in the EDAC error injection side of this problem
and that you are not getting a h/w initiated INT#18 event.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists