[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU177-W369899F15977E6D1D880C0C3A60@phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 22:57:06 -0700
From: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@...mail.com>
To: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"fernando@....ntt.co.jp" <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [tip:x86/urgent] x86-64, init: Do not set NX bits on non-NX
capable hardware
(resending as plaintext)
> During early init, we would incorrectly set the NX bit even if the NX
> feature was not supported. Instead, only set this bit if NX is
> actually available and enabled. We already do very early detection of
> the NX bit to enable it in EFER, this simply extends this detection to
> the early page table mask.
AFAIK the only production x86-64 processor that don't support NX that I know of is the original Nocona D0 stepping.
Must more common are the problem of BIOSes disabling the NX feature.
Yuhong Bao --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists