[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518FB27A.4070903@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 23:17:14 +0800
From: Liu Jiang <liuj97@...il.com>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5, part4 20/41] mm/h8300: prepare for removing num_physpages
and simplify mem_init()
On 05/09/2013 07:35 AM, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 12:29 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>
>> Although, not necessarily: it also supports CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG --
>> look at how pr_debug() is defined.
>> So this doesn't seem to be an equivalent change, and I suggest not doing
>> it at all.
>>
>> WBR, Sergei
>
> pr_devel() should get the same behavior: no code emitted unless debug
> is defined, if it is, output at KERN_DEBUG level.
>
Thanks Cody and Sergei, will use pr_devel() instead in next version.
Gerry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists