[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEsagEhf-kFL68HueXjbRZPvJVQD2FhiAprnBXk9qPfwaUhtxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 21:39:10 -0700
From: Daniel Phillips <daniel.raymond.phillips@...il.com>
To: james northrup <northrup.james@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tux3@...3.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what?
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:35 AM, james northrup
<northrup.james@...il.com> wrote:
> also interesting information... Study of 2,047 papers on PubMed finds
> that two-thirds of retracted papers were down to scientific
> misconduct, not error
Could you please be specific about the meaning you intend? Because
innuendo is less than useful in this forum. If you mean to say that
our posted results might not be independently verifiable then I invite
you to run the tests as described (including removing fsync) yourself.
If you require any assistance from us in doing that, we will be
pleased to provide it.
Regards,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists