lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 12 May 2013 12:11:54 +0200
From:	Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
To:	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks

2013/3/8 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>:
> 2013/3/5 Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>:
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Christian Gmeiner
>> <christian.gmeiner@...il.com> wrote:
>>> ping
>>> --
>>> Christian Gmeiner, MSc
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/2/23 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>:
>>>> 2013/2/15 Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Christian Gmeiner
>>>>> <christian.gmeiner@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> During the development of this driver an in-house register
>>>>>> documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests
>>>>>> were done and this problem was found. It turned out that
>>>>>> the released register documentation is wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our customers can control LEDs from userspace via Java,
>>>>>> C++ or what every. They have running/working applications where
>>>>>> they want to control led_3 but led_2 get's used.
>>>>>> I got a bug report in our in-house bug tracker so it would be
>>>>>> great to fix this upstream.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@...il.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Andrew, are you going to take care of this patch? Or I will merge this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whats the current state of the patch? Hope we can get it into 3.9 :)
>>>>
>>
>> I think this patch is already in linux-next via Andrew's tree (commit
>> 023206171f235f93f26c314f76f5405a3077aaba). So it will be merged into
>> 3.10 I guess, but not 3.9.
>>
>> Or I can send out this patch to Linus as a fix and ask Andrew to drop
>> this from his tree.
>>
>
> I am fine with the current situation and 3.10 is fine too.
>

3.10-rc1 is out but my patch is missing. What happened?

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?id=refs%2Ftags%2Fv3.10-rc1&qt=author&q=gmeiner

--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists