[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3026061.6K3iqZoMUx@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 14:14:04 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq, ondemand: Remove leftover debug line
On Sunday, May 12, 2013 08:46:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> >
> > I don't see how the virtual address of the tuners pointer would be of
> > any help to anyone so remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > index b0ffef96bf77..4b9bb5def6f1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
> > @@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ static int od_init(struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
> > tuners->io_is_busy = should_io_be_busy();
> >
> > dbs_data->tuners = tuners;
> > - pr_info("%s: tuners %p\n", __func__, tuners);
> > mutex_init(&dbs_data->mutex);
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Sorry for this message :(
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Applied to the linux-next branch.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists