linux-kernel - linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3-10-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130513111805.391a4d4c605d5cbfc3e8ff4d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 13 May 2013 11:18:05 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3-10-rc1)

On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:00:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> So this is the biggest -rc1 in the last several years (perhaps ever)

ever (see http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html after today's
linux-next release).

> Which was unexpected, because while linux-next was fairly big, it
> wasn't exceptionally so. I'm sure Stephen Rothwell will talk about the
> statistics of commits that weren't in -next, we'll see if that was the
> reason..

Since you asked ... :-)

This was the second biggest linux-next ever (in terms of commits) the one
before v3.8 was somewhat larger).

(No merge commits counted, next-20130429 was the last linux-next before v3.9)

Commits in v3.10-rc1 (relative to v3.9): 11963
Commits in next-20130429:		 11300
Commits with the same SHA1:		  9708
Commits with the same patch_id:		   885	(1)
Commits with the same subject line:	    91	(1)

(1) not counting those in the lines above.

So commits in -rc1 that were "in" next-20130429:	10684	89.3%
						(down from 90.6% last time)
Commits in -rc1 that were not in next-20120722:		 1279	10.7%

Pretty good, but it would be still nice to figure out where the last lot
came from.  I have the "git log --oneline --no-walk" list if someone wants them.

Some breakdown of that list:

Top ten first word of commit summary:

     27 NVMe
     29 xfs
     41 drm
     47 powerpc
     59 rbd
     64 arm
     78 media
     84 mips
     92 SCSI
    101 btrfs

Top ten authors:

     19 Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
     19 Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
     21 Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
     22 James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>
     25 John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
     26 Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@...tec.com>
     28 Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
     31 Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
     35 Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
     64 Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>

Top ten commiters:

     29 Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
     43 Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
     44 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
     54 Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>
     59 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
     80 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
     87 Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
     92 James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
     99 Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
    111 David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

Quite a few of these could be bug fixes (especially DaveM's).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped