linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 May 2013 17:53:37 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Christian Daudt <csd@...adcom.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
 description

Hi Jason,

Le 13/05/2013 17:19, Jason Cooper a écrit :
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:44:08AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
>> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
>> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
>> declaration for mvebu as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Maxime,
> 
> Do do want the individual submaintainers to take these?  Or, send one
> branch to Arnd and Olof?  I'm fine with either one as any merge
> conflicts should be trivial.

I don't have a strong opinion on this one, I guess both will be fine.
Arnd, Olof, what do you prefer?

I'll probably have to send a v2 anyway, I forgot to remove the include
of the irqchip headers.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/