linux-kernel - Re: EXT4 regression caused 4eec7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51911604.2060805@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 May 2013 11:34:12 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
CC:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	EUNBONG SONG <eunb.song@...sung.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: EXT4 regression caused 4eec7

On 5/12/13 4:01 AM, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> In fact '4eec70' are vexing because I have reviewed and tested this patch before
> it was marked as Review-by, but missed the bug. This is because xfstests
> was executed manually logs was full of warnings but tainted flag was not
> checked at the end. 

Can you elaborate on this?  What was logged, and is it something we could
try to pick up post-test in xfstests?

Thanks,
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/