lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51911826.907@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 May 2013 09:43:18 -0700
From:	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>,
	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 3.9.0 + CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=y  -> ThinkPad T420 with i5 lost
 ACPI functionality

On 05/03/2013 12:36 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 03, 2013 06:55:37 PM Toralf Förster wrote:
>> The following file doesn't exists at my Gentoo Linux
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/ignore_nice_load
>> in 3.9.0 if I activate CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=y
>>
>> That means, that a command like
>>
>> $> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ondemand/ignore_nice_load
>>
>> in /etc/rc.local is now no longer working.
>> A high fan +  high temperature are the result, even if just the BOINC client
>> is run with low prio (nice 19) in the back ground.
>>
>> Manually loading the missing module won't work too :
>>
>> $> modprobe acpi_cpufreq
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': Device or resource busy
>>
>> Is the behaviour a bug or a feature ?
>
> The thermal management problem is not an intentional outcome, definitely.
>
>> In the later case: How can I achieve the previous behaviour back ?
>>

I spent some more time looking for a solution to this you can get same behavior
by setting a config option in BOINC  "Use at most X % CPU time"
see: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Local_preferences


>> This issue might affect the RH EL kernel too [1] where I observed a similar behaviour.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=379
>
> Dirk, is this the problem we were talking about recently or something else?
>
> Rafael
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ