[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVs+gcuGKdW82g+rkrzo53UGn0zqU8KwsThCY8STwCd0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 21:16:06 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sfc: Reduce RX scatter buffer size to multiple of 256
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Ben Hutchings
<bhutchings@...arflare.com> wrote:
>> error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: sizeof(struct efx_rx_page_state) +
>> EFX_PAGE_IP_ALIGN + EFX_RX_USR_BUF_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE / 2
>> make[4]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.o] Error 1
>
> OK, this doesn't work because on s390 EFX_PAGE_IP_ALIGN == 2 (this macro
Yeah, that's what I just discovered, too.
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
#define EFX_PAGE_IP_ALIGN 0
#else
#define EFX_PAGE_IP_ALIGN NET_IP_ALIGN
#endif
> is equivalent to NET_IP_ALIGN, though that wasn't always true). So DMA
> is going to be misaligned on s390 anyway.
Hmm, so it's making the choice between misaligned CPU and misaligned
DMA? Sounds fishy...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists