[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1305132138160.2863@ionos>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 21:40:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: NOHZ: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:123
native_smp_send_reschedule
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -650,6 +650,7 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts,
> >
> > ts->last_tick = hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer);
> > ts->tick_stopped = 1;
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_online(cpu));
So that warning triggers.
> WARNING: at kernel/time/tick-sched.c:653 tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick+0x38e/0x3a0()
The pre full dyntick idle code bailed out when a cpu was offline. The
new fangled can_stop_idle_tick() function dropped that.
Does the patch below fix the issue?
Thanks,
tglx
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index bc67d42..00a9a97 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
if (unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))) {
if (cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
tick_do_timer_cpu = TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE;
+ return false;
}
if (unlikely(ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists