[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130514083621.GA20995@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:36:21 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] perf: Adding better precise_ip field handling
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:43:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Note that at least for user-space, REP MOVS is getting rarer. libc uses
> SSE based memcpy/memset variants - which is not miscounted by PEBS. The
> kernel still uses REP MOVS - but it's a special case because it cannot
> cheaply use vector registers.
>
> The vast majority of code gets measured by cycles:pp more accurately than
> cycles.
>
> We could try and see how many people complain. It's not like it's hard to
> undo such a change of the default event?
>
People may optimize for a wrong case instead of complaining. There is
nothing that obviously broken, only if you know what to look for the
brokenness can be seen.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists