| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51923232.2010304@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 20:46:42 +0800
From: Liu Jiang <liuj97@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, part 1 6/9] ACPI, pci_root: use acpi_handle_print()
and pr_xxx() to print messages
On 05/14/2013 07:27 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:08:30 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Use acpi_handle_print() and pr_xxx() to print messages in pci_root.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
>> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
>> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> index 91ddfd6..9ced5c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> @@ -379,23 +379,23 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>> u32 flags, base_flags;
>> bool is_osc_granted = false;
>> + acpi_handle hdl = device->handle;
> The usual way is to call it 'handle'. Any reason why not to do it here
Hi Rafael,
Just to avoid splitting some code into two lines, I could to use
"handle"
if preferred.
>> root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!root)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> segment = 0;
>> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL,
>> - &segment);
>> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, &segment);
>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>> + acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _SEG\n");
>> result = -ENODEV;
>> goto end;
>> }
>>
>> /* Check _CRS first, then _BBN. If no _BBN, default to zero. */
>> root->secondary.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
>> - status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(device->handle, &root->secondary);
>> + status = try_get_root_bridge_busnr(hdl, &root->secondary);
>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> /*
>> * We need both the start and end of the downstream bus range
>> @@ -404,16 +404,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>> * can do is assume [_BBN-0xFF] or [0-0xFF].
>> */
>> root->secondary.end = 0xFF;
>> - printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG PREFIX
>> - "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>> - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>> + acpi_handle_warn(hdl,
>> + FW_BUG "no secondary bus range in _CRS\n");
>> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(hdl, METHOD_NAME__BBN,
>> NULL, &bus);
>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>> root->secondary.start = bus;
>> else if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>> root->secondary.start = 0;
>> else {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>> + acpi_handle_err(hdl, "can't evaluate _BBN\n");
>> result = -ENODEV;
>> goto end;
>> }
>> @@ -425,11 +425,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>> strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PCI_ROOT_CLASS);
>> device->driver_data = root;
>>
>> - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>> + pr_info(PREFIX "%s [%s] (domain %04x %pR)\n",
>> acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
>> root->segment, &root->secondary);
>>
>> - root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(device->handle);
>> + root->mcfg_addr = acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(hdl);
>>
>> /*
>> * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
>> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>> dev_info(&device->dev,
>> "Requesting ACPI _OSC control (0x%02x)\n", flags);
>>
>> - status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(device->handle, &flags,
>> + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(hdl, &flags,
>> OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAP_STRUCTURE_CONTROL);
>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>> is_osc_granted = true;
>> @@ -505,9 +505,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>> */
>> root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
>> if (!root->bus) {
>> - printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
>> - "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>> - root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>> + acpi_handle_err(hdl,
>> + "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
>> + root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
>> result = -ENODEV;
>> goto end;
>> }
>> @@ -517,8 +517,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>> if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM)
>> pcie_clear_aspm(root->bus);
>> } else {
>> - pr_info("ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, "
>> - "disabling ASPM\n");
>> + acpi_handle_info(hdl,
>> + "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
>> pcie_no_aspm();
>> }
>>
>> @@ -571,12 +571,13 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_insertion(acpi_handle handle)
>> struct acpi_device *device;
>>
>> if (!acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device)) {
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi device exists...\n");
>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> + "acpi device exists...\n");
> Do we have acpi_handle_dbg()? If so, why don't you use it here? (And below.)
> If not, why don't you add it and use it here (and below)?
acpi_handle_dbg() only generates message if CONFIG_DEBUG is enabled,
so use pci_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, xxx) to keep original behavior.
Thanks,
Gerry
>
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> if (acpi_bus_scan(handle))
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>> + acpi_handle_err(handle, "cannot add bridge to acpi list\n");
>> }
>>
>> static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>> @@ -602,7 +603,6 @@ static void handle_root_bridge_removal(struct acpi_device *device)
>> static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER };
>> struct acpi_hp_work *hp_work;
>> acpi_handle handle;
>> u32 type;
>> @@ -613,13 +613,11 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
>>
>> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>> -
>> switch (type) {
>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
>> /* bus enumerate */
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> + "Bus check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>> if (!root)
>> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>>
>> @@ -627,27 +625,26 @@ static void _handle_hotplug_event_root(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
>> /* device check */
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device check notify on %s\n", __func__,
>> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> + "Device check notify on %s\n", __func__);
>> if (!root)
>> handle_root_bridge_insertion(handle);
>> break;
>>
>> case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
>> /* request device eject */
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__,
>> - (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> + "Device eject notify on %s\n", __func__);
>> if (root)
>> handle_root_bridge_removal(root->device);
>> break;
>> default:
>> - printk(KERN_WARNING "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%x for %s\n",
>> - type, (char *)buffer.pointer);
>> + acpi_handle_warn(handle,
>> + "notify_handler: unknown event type 0x%xn", type);
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> kfree(hp_work); /* allocated in handle_hotplug_event_bridge */
>> - kfree(buffer.pointer);
>> }
>>
>> static void handle_hotplug_event_root(acpi_handle handle, u32 type,
>> @@ -661,9 +658,6 @@ static acpi_status __init
>> find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>> {
>> acpi_status status;
>> - char objname[64];
>> - struct acpi_buffer buffer = { .length = sizeof(objname),
>> - .pointer = objname };
>> int *count = (int *)context;
>>
>> if (!acpi_is_root_bridge(handle))
>> @@ -671,16 +665,15 @@ find_root_bridges(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
>>
>> (*count)++;
>>
>> - acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
>> -
>> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(handle, ACPI_SYSTEM_NOTIFY,
>> handle_hotplug_event_root, NULL);
>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>> - objname, (unsigned int)status);
>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> + "notify handler is not installed, exit status: %u\n",
>> + (unsigned int)status);
>> else
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "acpi root: %s notify handler is installed\n",
>> - objname);
>> + acpi_handle_printk(KERN_DEBUG, handle,
>> + "notify handler is installed\n");
>>
>> return AE_OK;
>> }
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists