linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: pinctrl: vt8500: use devm_ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbbDzudp_W0d1VW1NCMUTHA25v2N3rXopQ+_zGrQB9AyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 14:52:31 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: pinctrl: vt8500: use devm_ioremap_resource()

On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@...il.com> wrote:

> Replace a call to deprecated devm_request_and_ioremap by devm_ioremap_resource.

Oh is that deprecated? I had no clue :-/
Can you point to some rationale about this so I'm not
totally misguided in my world..?

> Found with coccicheck and this semantic patch:
>  scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_ioremap_resource.cocci
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@...il.com>

Seems OK if the deprecation is ongoing.
Tony can I have your ACK?

>  drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c b/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
> index ab63104..e877082 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/vt8500/pinctrl-wmt.c
> @@ -569,10 +569,10 @@ int wmt_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
>         struct resource *res;
>
>         res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> -       data->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
> -       if (!data->base) {
> +       data->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +       if (IS_ERR(data->base)) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to map memory resource\n");
> -               return -EBUSY;
> +               return PTR_ERR(data->base);
>         }

Grant is just going to *not* love this type of patches replacing
nullchecks with IS_ERR() stuff all over the kernel.

We had a discussion whether the compiler can be made to
annotate and typecheck pointers to avoid doing mistakes with
pointers containing error codes like this. (Vague but you maybe
know what I'm after.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/