| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 16:20:09 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] ptp: PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH depends on x86 On 05/07/2013 09:29 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com> >> >> The PCH EG20T is only compatible with Intel Atom processors so it >> should depend on x86. > > This patch has been submitted before, > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2069071/ > > and at that time the reaction was that it is good to have drivers > cross-compiled, if only for code quality reasons. Hmm, then it depends whether the kernel is for users or for developers. I, as a user, do not really want to compile drivers with allmodconfig which I have no way to load/use. And allmodconfig is basically what we, users (SUSE distributors in this case) do. So having this driver being built makes our life harder (in the meaning we have to have specific rules about disabling unwanted drivers from configs). And, developers should have a testbed where they build 32bit configs. And we actually have that for -next AFAIU. thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists