[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130514151752.GB6795@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 08:17:52 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/workqueue.c: better to free related resources
when failure occurs in wq_numa_init()
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 08:25:20PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> When NUMA node mapping not available for one cpu, need disabling NUMA
> support and proceed.
>
> Also better to release unused resources (the original code can not
> cause issue, only waste some memory).
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 1ae6028..a763079 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -4911,6 +4911,9 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
> if (WARN_ON(node == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
> pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
> /* happens iff arch is bonkers, let's just proceed */
> + for_each_node(node)
> + free_cpumask_var(tbl[node]);
> + kfree(tbl);
Eh... let's just leave it alone. The path is taken iff the whole
thing is seriously broken and we're triggering WARN. I don't think we
need to worry about small memory wastage there.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists