[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51925F70.5000309@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 08:59:44 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/xen: sync the CMOS RTC as well as
the Xen wallclock
On 05/14/2013 12:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 14.05.13 at 02:52, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Honestly, it seems a little strange to me. If you're running as dom0,
>> why does HYPERVISOR_dom0_op() not cause the hypervisor to set the cmos
>> its virtualizing? This seems to mess with the proper virtualization
>> layering.
> Thy hypervisor tries to control as little system and peripheral devices
> as possible, and the CMOS (including the clock) is among those not
> controlled by it, but by Dom0.
Huh. So what does calling HYPERVISOR_dom0_op do then?
Either way, I don't have the context to insightfully review this, so
I'll want this to get some Acked-bys from additional Xen folks before I
queue it.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists