[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAG0J9_ScDGDvk4NF_ojLb1MgB0mA60htR3ay2Z4EvFvNRT1Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 21:35:20 +0100
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: add support for clock reparent on set_rate
On 14 May 2013 19:13, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
> Quoting James Hogan (2013-04-19 09:28:23)
>> Add core support to allow clock implementations to select the best
>> parent clock when rounding a rate, e.g. the one which can provide the
>> closest clock rate to that requested. This is by way of adding a new
>> clock op, determine_rate(), which is like round_rate() but has an extra
>> parameter to allow the clock implementation to optionally select a
>> different parent clock. The core then takes care of reparenting the
>> clock when setting the rate.
>>
>
> Hi James,
>
> Can you rebase this onto -rc1? It does not apply cleanly.
Hi Mike,
Sure, I rebased onto clk-next the other day so I'll update to rc1 and
resubmit tomorrow.
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists