[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130515083729.GC10510@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:37:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, dzickus@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nohz: Disable LOCKUP_DETECTOR when NO_HZ_FULL is
enabled
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 06:02:51PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> Trying to test the nohz_full code, I was not able to get it to work.
> Finally I enabled the tick_stop tracepoint and it showed:
>
> tick_stop: success=no msg=perf events running
>
> I talked to Frederic Weisbecker about this and he informed me that
> perf is used by the lockup detector. I checked the code, and sure
> enough it is.
>
> As perf is always running when LOCKUP_DETECTOR is enabled, which
> will always disable nohz_full from working, instead of confusing
> users, disable LOCKUP_DETECTOR when NO_HZ_FULL is enabled.
>
> When perf is changed such that it does not prevent nohz_full from
> working, then we can and should remove this constraint.
That's a bit contradictory in function, you want the NMI watchdog to
cover all code, so disabling whilst entering NO_HZ state is going to
make it not cover some code - *fail*.
Rather I would suggest disabling the NMI watchdog's runtime default; so
you can still enable it with something like:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists