[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130515014724.GN12246@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:47:24 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Christian Daudt <csd@...adcom.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration
in machine description
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:38AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > declaration for shmobile as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > index 899a86c..66694e0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-em.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > @@ -454,7 +453,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EMEV2_DT, "Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> > .smp = smp_ops(emev2_smp_ops),
> > .init_early = emev2_init_delay,
> > .nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> > - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> > .init_machine = emev2_add_standard_devices_dt,
> > .dt_compat = emev2_boards_compat_dt,
> > MACHINE_END
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Sorry, what I should have said is:
Queued up for v3.11 in the soc-emev2 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists