[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130515105656.GI24440@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 12:56:56 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tty: Add missing lock in n_tty_write()
The call of the tty->ops->write callback is protected by
output_lock in all other places I looked at. So it seems the
lock in this code-branch is missing, so take the output_lock
there too.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
---
drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
index d655416..ffb94a4 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
@@ -2058,10 +2058,14 @@ static ssize_t n_tty_write(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
if (tty->ops->flush_chars)
tty->ops->flush_chars(tty);
} else {
+ struct n_tty_data *l = tty->disc_data;
+
+ mutex_lock(&l->output_lock);
while (nr > 0) {
c = tty->ops->write(tty, b, nr);
if (c < 0) {
retval = c;
+ mutex_unlock(&l->output_lock);
goto break_out;
}
if (!c)
@@ -2069,6 +2073,7 @@ static ssize_t n_tty_write(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
b += c;
nr -= c;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&l->output_lock);
}
if (!nr)
break;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists