[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130515014901.GR12246@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:49:01 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Christian Daudt <csd@...adcom.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq
declaration in machine description
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:46:04AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:07AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > > declaration for shmobile as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
> > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> > > };
> > >
> > > DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
> > > - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> > > .init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
> > > .init_machine = ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
> > > .dt_compat = ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
>
> Sorry, what I should have said is:
>
> Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-spe6evm branch of my renesas tree
s/spe6evm/ape6evm/
> on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
> that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists