lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 15 May 2013 08:34:51 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ARM: delay: print dummy values for bogomips

On Wed, 15 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:

> On Wed 2013-05-15 10:01:03, Will Deacon wrote:
> > My second (less stupid) version of the patch prints "not reported".

Even then, you should tell the truth and say "not available" or "not 
applicable".

> > I'd be happy to remove the line altogether if people get behind the 
> > decision though.

You certainly have my ACK.

> > In fact, I just tried it and at least my linaro filesystem seems happy
> > enough.
> 
> Would it be too much work to simply put the field back with the right
> value? We don't have to get it as precise as we used to, that should
> make slowdown minimum.

There is simply no right value.  And whenever there is a value, people 
read too much into it.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ