lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKt3ReLZqGS3DiG_+T+N0YDzte9pLpP8kVVoX_98vTU9tPV3pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 May 2013 16:08:20 +0300
From:	"Darius D." <darius.ski@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Function call interrupts (CAL) high values in 3.9.2 kernel

Hi,

after upgrading to 3.9.2 (from 3.2.1) we have noticed million sized
spikes in Function call interrupts (CAL) graphics in Munin monitoring.

After some investigation we have found that it is caused by completely
borked numbers in /proc/interrupts

for example current output is:
CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4       CPU5       CPU6
      CPU7       CPU8       CPU9       CPU10      CPU11      CPU12
 CPU13      CPU14      CPU15      C6      CPU17      CPU18      CPU19
    CPU20      CPU21      CPU22      CPU23
CAL: 4294967272    5513065         56    5567608         21    5513363
        50    5583946         42    5431365         32    5681459
  100    2613904         95    2494755         95    2554234
122    2434635         74    2472960         63    2504140   Function
call interrupts

As you can see CPU1 output has really crazy value (FFFFFFE8), but we
have seen some other values on other cpus as well. It changes suddenly
from valid values, to nearly FFFFFFFF and then might return back after
some time.
There are no spikes in cpu usage, no interrupts, context switches,
just /proc/interrupts is wrong. it went stright from ~50 to FFFFFFE8
in one step.

System is dual Xeon X5650 NUMA box. ( kinda only interesting options
are THP with defrag off and that new Numa memory placement aware
scheduler is off ).

Anyone got any clue why it is happening?

Best regards,

Darius.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ