linux-kernel - Re: V3.10-rc1 memory leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5192FDE2.1020305@lwfinger.net>
Date:	Tue, 14 May 2013 22:15:46 -0500
From:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: V3.10-rc1 memory leak

On 05/14/2013 07:57 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 17:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 16:10 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2013 03:30 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just got a patch today:
>>>>
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/10/607
>>>>
>>>> which could be related. If Rusty doesn't push it I'll do. But please let
>>>> me know if it does not solve the problem.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes my problem. Now I can see the next new problem reported by
>>> kmemleak. :)
>>>
>>> Thanks to you and Jianpeng Ma,
>>>
>>> Larry
>>>
>>
>> It goes away on my testing too. So you can add:
>>
>> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>>
>
> But we are not out of the woods yet. I'm also getting these:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88007800efc0 (size 32):
>    comm "modprobe", pid 1309, jiffies 4294697214 (age 188.356s)
>    hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 a8 d0 3e a0 ff ff ff ff  ..........>.....
>      30 d1 3e a0 ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  0.>.............
>    backtrace:
>      [<ffffffff814b535f>] kmemleak_alloc+0x73/0x98
>      [<ffffffff8112003c>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive.constprop.42+0x16/0x18
>      [<ffffffff81120dfe>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xc0/0x10b
>      [<ffffffff810e5478>] jump_label_module_notify+0xce/0x1d5
>      [<ffffffff814d221d>] notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x63
>      [<ffffffff8105c29c>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4b/0x60
>      [<ffffffff8105c2c5>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
>      [<ffffffff8108fe83>] load_module+0x1d7f/0x20d3
>      [<ffffffff810902b0>] SyS_init_module+0xd9/0xdb
>      [<ffffffff814d5754>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
>      [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> Where it points to the allocation in jump_label_add_module() where it
> allocates the jlm. And this does get freed in jump_label_del_module(). I
> put in printks in add_module():
>
> 	printk("alloc %p (%s)\n", jlm, mod->name);
>
> and in del_module:
>
> 	printk("free %p (%s)\n", jlm, mod->name);
>
> And got this:
>
> [   29.917577] alloc ffff88007800efc0 (kvm_intel)
>
>
> And removing kvm_intel, I got:
>
> [  364.965916] free ffff88007800efc0 (kvm_intel)
>
>
> Thus it seems to be yet another false positive :-(

I do not see that particular one; however, I see 4 instances of

unreferenced object 0xffff8800b7979750 (size 8):
   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892402 (age 21888.316s)
   hex dump (first 8 bytes):
     31 38 00 b7 00 88 ff ff                          18......
   backtrace:
     [<ffffffff81432ea1>] kmemleak_alloc+0x21/0x50
     [<ffffffff81145d50>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x140/0x2b0
     [<ffffffff81119fb5>] kstrdup+0x35/0x70
     [<ffffffff8125febc>] acpi_set_pnp_ids+0xd0/0x304
     [<ffffffff81260c47>] acpi_scan_init_hotplug+0x47/0xa1
     [<ffffffff81261223>] acpi_bus_check_add+0x66/0xd7
     [<ffffffff8127877a>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0xb9/0x173
     [<ffffffff81278bf3>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x93/0xc6
     [<ffffffff812612dc>] acpi_bus_scan+0x48/0x9a
     [<ffffffff818c983d>] acpi_scan_init+0x57/0x14b
     [<ffffffff818c966a>] acpi_init+0x244/0x286
     [<ffffffff810002fa>] do_one_initcall+0x10a/0x160
     [<ffffffff8189cef0>] kernel_init_freeable+0x103/0x192
     [<ffffffff814313a9>] kernel_init+0x9/0xf0
     [<ffffffff8144992c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
     [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

All four were allocated early in the bootup, and are the only leaks reported in 
my system. I have not yet tested to see if they are false.

Larry


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/