[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51940C9F.6000804@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:30:55 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 13/15] clockevents: Provide sysfs interface
On 05/15/13 02:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 04/25, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Provide a simple sysfs interface for the clockevent devices. Show the
>>> current active clockevent device.
>>>
>> Neat. Does this do anything about clockevents that aren't in use
>> for the tick devices or broadcast device?
> No, but that would be simple to add.
What would it look like? Right now I think we have clockevent0,1,2,3,
etc. for all the cpus and a broadcast0 device. The broadcast0 device is
present even if we don't actually have a broadcast device in the system
(i.e. it says <null> for its name).
Would we add unused_clockevent0,1,2? Maybe we should have clockevent
devices for each physical evtdev and then symlinks for clockevent0,1,2,3
and broadcast0 that point to the physical clockevent device?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists