[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1368592699.11843.10.camel@kjgkr>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 13:38:19 +0900
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix inconsistency of block count during recovery
2013-05-15 (수), 12:47 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index 3df43b4..9641534 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1492,6 +1492,8 @@ int recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > struct page *page)
> > new_ni = old_ni;
> > new_ni.ino = ino;
> >
> Hi. Jaegeuk.
>
> I have a minor comment.
> > + if (!inc_valid_node_count(sbi, NULL, 1))
> > + WARN_ON(1);
Hi Namjae,
Negative since inc_valid_node_count() is not for debugging.
IMO, for readability, we need to make clear what the function call is
used for.
Thank you for the review. :)
> How about change WARN_ON(!inc_valid_node_count(sbi, NULL, 1)); ?
>
> Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
> Thanks.
> > set_node_addr(sbi, &new_ni, NEW_ADDR);
> > inc_valid_inode_count(sbi);
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists