[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5194E380.1030109@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:47:44 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: tty: memory corruption through tty_release/tty_ldisc_release
On 05/16/2013 02:45 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after some pain because the "big step" (ecbbfd4) happened while the support for my AMD CPU was broken and thus git bisect hit a series of kernels which didn't boot, I've finally found the cause for a memory corruption: tty_ldisc_release().
>
> What happens is the following:
>
> tty_port is self-destructing, that means it destroys itself in tty_port.c:tty_port_destructor() when the last reference is gone. E.g. in case of rfcomm this happens with the call to tty->ops->close() in tty_io.c:tty_release().
>
> The problem here is that tty_io.c:tty_release() calls tty_ldisc.c:tty_ldisc_release() which uses the tty_port to flush the ldisc work queues.
>
> In the best case this hits a BUG() in cancel_work_sync() but often it just causes a memory corruption without a BUG() got hit before.
Hi Alexander,
Actually, the problem is that tty->ops->close() shouldn't be
the last kref on the port.
It doesn't look to me like device removal is being handled
properly.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists