linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/15] perf ftrace: Add 'record' sub-command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fvxn4pby.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 May 2013 11:43:13 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] perf ftrace: Add 'record' sub-command

On Wed, 15 May 2013 23:21:39 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:13:53PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
>> 
>> The ftrace record command is for saving raw ftrace buffer contents
>> which can be get from per_cpu/cpuX/trace_pipe_raw.
>> 
>> Since ftrace events are generated very frequently so single thread for
>> recording mostly resulted in buffer overruns.  Thus it uses per-cpu
>> recorder thread to prevent such cases and they save the contents to
>> their own files.
>> 
>> These per-cpu data files are saved in a directory so that they can be
>> easily found when needed.  I chose the default directory name as
>> "perf.data.dir" and the first two (i.e. "perf.data") can be changed
>> with -o option.  The structure of the directory looks like:
>> 
>>   $ tree perf.data.dir
>>   perf.data.dir/
>>   |-- perf.header
>>   |-- trace-cpu0.buf
>>   |-- trace-cpu1.buf
>>   |-- trace-cpu2.buf
>>   `-- trace-cpu3.buf
>> 
>> In addition to trace-cpuX.buf files, it has perf.header file also.
>> The perf.header file is compatible with existing perf.data format and
>> contains usual event information, feature mask and sample data.  The
>> sample data is synthesized to indicate given cpu has a record file.
>
> so AFAICS we store sample event for each cpu we recorded (in record
> command) and by processing those samples (show/report) we get data
> files names for each cpu

Correct.

>
> hum, I might have missed some discussion about this, but seems
> like header feature fits better for this, as long as we store
> only cpus.. FTRACE_CPUS or something like thius with simple array

Well, there's no discussion on this side so far. :)

I wanted not to add a new header feature only for this but use existing
method (sample event) so that it also can be recognized - at least to
have very rough idea - by an incompatible version of the perf tool.
Maybe the event has more information like total number of samples as a
period.

>
> or if we are going to use event, maybe user event via
> enum perf_user_event_type fits better

IIRC some people don't want to add more user event types.

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/