[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5195242A.4040007@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:23:38 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"eag0628@...il.com" <eag0628@...il.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:385 smp_call_function_many
On 04/18/2013 08:29 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi Liu,
>
> On 04/18/2013 08:10 PM, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
>>> It seems that with commit "smp: Give WARN()ing when calling
>>>> smp_call_function_many()/single() in serving irq" I'm getting a bunch of these:
>> This patch gives the warning even when the smp_call_function_many() is called in softirq context,
>> because it will bring the possible deadlock cases, the example is below:
>> CPUA CPUB
>> spin_lock(&spinlock)
>> Any irq coming, call the irq handler
>> irq_exit()
>> spin_lock_irq(&spinlock)
>> <== Blocking here due to
>> CPUB hold it
>> __do_softirq()
>> run_timer_softirq()
>> timer_cb()
>> call smp_call_function_many()
>> send IPI interrupt to CPUA
>> wait_csd()
>>
>> Then both CPUA and CPUB will be deadlocked here.
>
> Right.
>
> So commit f55a6faa3 ("hrtimer: Provide clock_was_set_delayed()") followed by one
> of the commits that used clock_was_set_delayed() may trigger the deadlock you've
> described. (cc John Stultz...)
Ping?
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists