[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51945384.9060308@asianux.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:33:24 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/workqueue.c: need call device_remove_file() when
failure occurs after called device_create_file()
On 05/16/2013 05:22 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 02:13:14PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> In workqueue_sysfs_register(), when failure occurs after called
>> device_create_file(), need call device_remove_file() to release the
>> related resources, then call device_unregister().
>>
>> Or it will cause issue.
>>
>> For individual 'device_attributs' (just like our case), need call
>> device_remove_file() explictly and then call device_unregister(),
>> please reference drivers/base/*.c (e.g node.c or cpu.c).
>
> Hmm... isn't this already taken care of by __sysfs_remove_dir() which
> device_unregister() calls? That function removes all non-directory
> files under the directory being removed.
>
It just like what you said:
device_unregister() ->
kobject_del() ->
sysfs_remove_dir() ->
__sysfs_remove_dir() ->
sysfs_remove_one()
But:
device_remove_file() ->
sysfs_remove_file() ->
...
sysfs_attr_ns() ->
ops->namespace() (such as device_namespace() in workqueue.c)
...
sysfs_hash_and_remove() ->
sysfs_remove_one().
So if not call device_remove_file() explicitly, the device_namespace()
may be not called.
Even in device_unregister(), it still call device_remove_file() to
release the related attributes firstly, then call kobject_del().
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists