linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 May 2013 22:51:25 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
	Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
	charles.garcia-tobin@....com, arvind.chauhan@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 02:09:46 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 May 2013 14:16, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:39:55 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Here are few more fixes for 3.10-rc2.
> >
> > I'm actually going to sent the for-rc2 request today, so these are for -rc3.
> 
> Okay. No issues.

While I kind of understand why you want [3/3] to go into 3.10, I'm wondering
about the other two patches.  Why exactly are they needed now?

And speaking of patch [3/3], if you paste kernel logs into changelogs, please
remove the time stamps (unless they are relevant to the problem being fixed).

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/