linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Power management and ACPI fixes for v3.10-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxhDO0D1nQgTFWSiZT9AJMSF9oOUoxWj=Y=5en0nWC92g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 May 2013 15:25:35 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>,
	Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Power management and ACPI fixes for v3.10-rc2

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> - intel_pstate driver fixes and cleanups from Dirk Brandewie and
>   Wei Yongjun.

Btw, is there some fundamental reason why the pstate driver is limited
to so few models?

I've tested it on models 0x25 (i5-670) and 0x3a (i5-3427U), and it
seems to work. But neither model is listed. (only 0x2a and 0x2d are).

I understand that people want to be careful, but it's not actually
getting very much *testing* right now, is it? Are models 0x2a/0x2d
actually special in any way?

                  Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/