lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLkshrBDDKtdf+KYufg=83Yn7zAFmHKUpoA848JzbQKmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 May 2013 17:44:15 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	vladimir.barinov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] <linux/of_platform.h>: fix compilation warnings with DT disabled

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 03/01/2013 05:02 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Fix the following compilation warnings (in Simon Horman's
>>>>>>> renesas.git repo):
>>>>>>> In file included from arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7779.c:24:0:
>>>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct of_device_id’
>>>>>>> declared
>>>>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: its scope is only this
>>>>>>> definition
>>>>>>> or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by
>>>>>>> default]
>>>>>>> include/linux/of_platform.h:107:13: warning: ‘struct device_node’
>>>>>>> declared
>>>>>>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>>>>>>> <linux/of_platform.h> only #include's headers with definitions of
>>>>>>> the above
>>>>>>> mentioned structures if CONFIG_OF_DEVICE=y but uses them even if
>>>>>>> not. One
>>>>>>> solution is to move some #include's out of #ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE
>>>>>>> and use
>>>>>>> incomplete declarations for the rest of the structures where the
>>>>>>> #ifdef move
>>>>>>> doesn't help...
>>>>>>> Reported-by: Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov@...entembedded.com>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
>>>>>> Grant, could you consider taking this patch?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I can, but I don't seem to have the original patch. Can you send
>>>>> it
>>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> Nevermind. Found it. I'll apply it.
>>>
>>>     Will you drop 'struct device_node' declaration then or should I
>>> resend? In fact, I think I should better resend it with the changelog
>>> somewhat edited.
>>
>> No, I plan to leave it as is and not rely on device.h by chance
>> declaring device_node.
>
>
>     I hoped to see this fix in 3.10-rc1. Is there any hope to see it in
> 3.10-rc's?
> The code it fixes the warnings in is already in Linus tree.

So I had this queued up, but Grant did not send DT update to Linus for
3.10. The main thing we had was the preprocessor support and that went
thru arm-soc tree. I plan to send this and other fixes to Linus for
3.10.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ