[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130516050450.GA13842@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:04:53 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the renesas tree with Linus' tree
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:22:53PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the renesas tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c between commit 65be2de17aae ("ARM:
> shmobile: use r8a7790 timer setup code on Lager") from Linus' tree and
> commit 993340a1390d ("ARM: shmobile: use r8a7790 timer setup code on
> Lager") from the renesas tree.
>
> These are the same patch but different commits :-( and there are further
> commits touching this file in the renesas tree. Please clean up your
> tree and remove anything that has already gone upstream as different
> patches. I used the renesas tree version of this file.
Sorry about that. I am working on re-basing my branches on
top of v3.10-rc1 and I have confirmed that in my current local
branches the problem you describe is no longer present.
I plan to push the refreshed branches, including a new next branch
for linux-next, once a few bug-fix patches have been reviewed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists