linux-kernel - Re: [Bug] ARM 'perf' regression by commit a43cb95d5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130517155936.GQ23112@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 May 2013 16:59:36 +0100
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug] ARM 'perf' regression by commit a43cb95d5

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:07:37AM +0100, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:48:23AM +0100, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > It's probably easier if you choose a workload, otherwise it's difficult to
> >> > see what is `correct' and what is broken. For example, your broken output
> >> > seems to be in the smsc95xx driver, so assumedly there's a bunch of
> >> > networking going on whereas your other output is in cpuidle_enter_state.
> >>
> >> If all modules are removed, the result will become OK. And if I only insert one
> >> module, the top sample will fall inside the only module, but I am sure
> >> nothing is working on the symbols of the module.

Ok, I tried to reproduce this on my TC2 with 3.10-rc1 and perf top looks
fine. I also tried loading your spi-altera module and it made no difference.

I'm using a fairly old perf tool (reports its version as 3.5.5).

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/